The combination of (1) the USPTO’s new proposed court-like
claim-construction for IPRs and (2) the Supreme Court’s SAS decision
collectively provides some opportunity for a de facto administrative claim
construction procedure. It is likely
that a substantial portion of IPR participants will now be focused as much on
claim construction as on the underlying validity arguments themselves. Although this is already going on to some
extent, once the courts and PTO apply the same standard of law, PTAB claim
construction determinations could then be taken as decided issues of law (or at
least highly persuasive authority) handed back for the stayed (or upcoming)
district court litigation.
No comments:
Post a Comment